What is UU culture?

Why isn’t Unitarian Universalism more universal in its appeal? Why, almost two decades after committing to become a multiracial and multicultural faith tradition, is the Unitarian Uni­versalist Association still struggling to welcome people from a broader range of cultural, racial, and ethnic backgrounds?

The Spring issue of UU World featured provocative articles by the Rev. Dr. Paul Rasor and the Rev. Rosemary Bray McNatt that explored these questions. Rasor asked, “Do we reflect the pluralistic and multicultural reality of our time, or have we fatally linked our brand of religious liberalism to a culture that is disappearing?” McNatt observed that “race and ethnicity have stood in during our conversations for something more ineffable, more complex, more edgy than we are willing to discuss. We are speaking as well about matters of culture—Unitarian Universalist culture.”

We invited readers to respond to Rasor and McNatt, and asked: What is “UU culture”? In what ways does UU culture embody our deepest values? In what ways does it express narrow or exclusive assumptions about who truly belongs? A handful of responses appear below, with more online at uuworld.org and in the Letters section, page 8.

Responses in the Summer issue

• Our narrow niche, by James Kubal-Komoto

• The junior high factor, by Jason Shelton

• Our rarefied culture, by Offie C. Wortham

• Let's take off the hair shirt, by Marilyn Sewell

• I'm proud of UU culture, by John F. Katz

• Change vision, not culture, by Betty Bobo Seiden

• Embrace spiritual complexity, by Cynthia Letts Adcock

• Letters to the Editor

From the archives

• Message or culture? by Doug Muder (uuworld.org, 8.17.09)

• Can Unitarian Universalism change? by Paul Rasor (Spring 2010)

• We must change, by Rosemary Bray McNatt (Spring 2010)